📰🤖 Da Big A.I. Legal Showdown: NY Times vs. Chatbots
⬇️ Pidgin | ⬇️ ⬇️ English
Aloha kakou! Check dis out – Da New York Times wen’ go legal on OpenAI and Microsoft, da big kahunas behind dem popular A.I. chatbots. Dey saying plenty of their articles wen get used for train dese chatbots, and now dey filing one copyright infringement lawsuit. Dis one serious kine battle brewing in da tech and media arena.
Da Times, one major kahuna in da American media scene, is da first for sue dese companies. Da lawsuit, filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan, claims dat millions of their articles wen get used for train automated chatbots dat now acting like one competitor for da news outlet as one source of information. 🗞️💥
Dis lawsuit no say exactly how much moolah dey asking for, but dey saying da defendants gotta pay up “billions of dollars in damages” ’cause of da “unlawful copying and use of The Times’s work.” Dey also like da companies for destroy any chatbot models and training data dat used stuff from da Times. 📜💣
Microsoft neva comment on da case, and OpenAI neva give one immediate response.
Dis lawsuit could shake up da legal scene for generative A.I. technologies – da kine dat create text, images, and oddah content afta learning from big piles of data. Could get big kine implications for da news industry, where da Times stay one of da few dat wen’ do good with online journalism. But plenny newspapers and magazines wen struggle ’cause readers wen’ move to da internet. 🌐📉
OpenAI and oddah A.I. tech firms, attracting billions in funding, use all kine online texts – from newspaper articles to poems to screenplays – for train chatbots. OpenAI now valued at more than $80 billion, and Microsoft wen’ throw in $13 billion into OpenAI, even using their tech in da Bing search engine.
Da Times’s complaint says, “Defendants seek for free-ride on The Times’s journalism,” accusing OpenAI and Microsoft of “using The Times’s content without payment to create products dat take away from The Times.” 🚨💼
Da defendants no can respond in court yet.
Dis whole thing about using creative work for train A.I. systems get people from all ova da creative industries worried, ’cause da tech can mimic natural language and generate sophisticated written responses.
Sarah Silverman, da actress, joined lawsuits against Meta and OpenAI, accusing dem of using her memoir as training text for A.I. programs. Novelists like Jonathan Franzen and John Grisham wen sue wen A.I. systems absorbed thousands of books. Getty Images, da photography syndicate, also sued one A.I. company dat generates images based on written prompts.
Da lawsuit filed on Wednesday looks like it comes afta no can make deal in negotiations involving da Times, Microsoft, and OpenAI. Da Times wen’ approach Microsoft and OpenAI in April for talk about using their intellectual property and was looking for “an amicable resolution” but no can find one solution.
Da lawsuit by da Times also sees ChatGPT and oddah A.I. systems as competitors in da news business. Wen chatbots get asked about current events or oddah news stuff, dey can generate answers using past journalism from da Times. Da newspaper worried dat readers going be satisfied with da chatbot response and no bother for visit da Times’s website, cutting into web traffic and da kala dey make from ads and subscriptions.
Da complaint get examples wen chatbots wen give users almost da same ting from Times articles dat normally need one paid subscription for see. It says dat OpenAI and Microsoft wen’ focus on using Times journalism for train their A.I. programs ’cause dey think da material reliable and accurate.
Oddah media organizations been checking out da legal, financial, and journalistic implications of dis A.I. boom. Some news outlets wen’ make deals for use their journalism: da Associated Press wen’ make one licensing deal with OpenAI, and Axel Springer, da German publisher dat owns Politico and Business Insider, wen’ do da same.
Afta da Axel Springer deal, one OpenAI spokesperson said da company respects “da rights of content creators and owners and believes dey should benefit from A.I. technology.”
Da Times exploring how for use dis new tech. Da newspaper wen’ hire one editorial director of artificial intelligence initiatives for establish protocols for da newsroom’s use of A.I. and look at ways for integrate da technology into their journalism.
One example of how A.I. systems use da Times’s material, da suit showed dat Browse With Bing, one Microsoft search feature powered by ChatGPT, wen’ reproduce almost verbatim results from Wirecutter, da Times’s product review site. Da Bing text results neva link to da Wirecutter article
, and dey took out da referral links in da text dat Wirecutter uses for make commission from sales based on their recommendations.
Da lawsuit states, “Decreased traffic to Wirecutter articles and, in turn, decreased traffic to affiliate links subsequently lead to a loss of revenue for Wirecutter.”
Da lawsuit also highlights da potential damage to da Times’s brand through so-called A.I. “hallucinations,” where chatbots insert false info dat den gets wrongly attributed to a source. Da complaint cites cases where Microsoft’s Bing Chat provided incorrect info said to come from da Times.
“If The Times and oddah news organizations cannot produce and protect their independent journalism, gonna get one vacuum dat no computer or A.I. can fill,” da complaint reads. “Less journalism will be produced, and da cost to society gonna be huge.”
Da Times has retained da law firm Susman Godfrey as its lead outside counsel for da litigation. Susman represented Dominion Voting Systems in their defamation case against Fox News, which resulted in a $787.5 million settlement. Susman also filed a proposed class action suit against Microsoft and OpenAI on behalf of nonfiction authors.
So, das da 411, braddahs and sistahs. Da New York Times throwing down against da A.I. giants, standing up for their rights and work. Dis one legal battle worth watching. 📰💻👀🔒📚
NOW IN ENGLISH
NY Times Takes On A.I. Giants Over Copyright Claims 📰💻
Hello everyone! Here’s a major update from the intersection of tech and media: The New York Times has initiated a legal battle against OpenAI and Microsoft over copyright infringement. The media giant alleges that millions of its articles were used to train chatbots that now rival its own news platform.
The Times, a leading force in American media, is the first major organization to sue these tech companies, creators of ChatGPT and other A.I. platforms. Filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan, the lawsuit asserts that the Times’s articles were utilized to train chatbots, positioning them as competitors in delivering reliable information. 🗞️⚖️
While the lawsuit doesn’t specify an exact monetary claim, it suggests that the defendants owe “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages” for the “unlawful copying and use of The Times’s content.” The Times also demands that the companies destroy any chatbot models and training data incorporating their copyrighted material.
Microsoft has not commented on the case, and OpenAI did not immediately respond.
This lawsuit could redefine the legal landscape surrounding generative A.I. technologies and holds significant implications for the news industry. The Times, one of the few success stories in online journalism, has seen others in the field struggle due to the shift to digital media. 🌐📉
OpenAI and other A.I. tech firms have been training chatbots using various online texts, including newspaper articles, poems, and screenplays. OpenAI is currently valued at over $80 billion, with Microsoft investing $13 billion in the company and integrating its technology into the Bing search engine.
The Times’s complaint accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of “free-riding” on its journalism and using its content to create products that substitute for The Times and draw away its audience. 🚨💼
The defendants are yet to respond in court.
The use of creative works to train A.I. systems has raised concerns across creative industries due to the technology’s ability to mimic natural language and generate sophisticated responses.
High-profile figures like Sarah Silverman have joined lawsuits against Meta and OpenAI, alleging that her memoir was used as training material for A.I. programs. Authors including Jonathan Franzen and John Grisham have expressed alarm over A.I. systems absorbing vast quantities of books. Getty Images sued an A.I. company that generates images based on written prompts for unauthorized use of its copyrighted visual materials.
Negotiations involving The Times, Microsoft, and OpenAI apparently reached a deadlock, prompting the lawsuit. The Times approached the companies in April to address intellectual property concerns and seek an “amicable resolution,” but talks yielded no agreement.
Besides defending its intellectual property, The Times’s lawsuit views ChatGPT and other A.I. systems as competitors in the news industry. When chatbots answer queries on current events or newsworthy topics, they often rely on past journalism from The Times. The newspaper is concerned that chatbot responses might satisfy readers’ needs, leading to reduced website traffic and consequent loss in advertising and subscription revenue.
The complaint cites instances where chatbots provided near-verbatim excerpts from Times articles, typically behind a paywall. The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI and Microsoft particularly emphasized Times journalism in their A.I. training due to its perceived reliability and accuracy.🔒📚
Other media organizations have been scrutinizing the legal, financial, and journalistic implications of the rise in generative A.I. Some, like The Associated Press and Axel Springer, have entered into licensing agreements with OpenAI for the use of their journalism. The terms of these agreements have not been disclosed.
The Times itself is exploring ways to integrate A.I. technology into its journalism, having recently appointed an editorial director for artificial intelligence initiatives.
An example of A.I. systems utilizing Times content is demonstrated by Microsoft’s Browse With Bing, which replicated results from Wirecutter, The Times’s product review site, almost verbatim. However, Bing’s results did not link back to the Wirecutter article and removed the referral links that Wirecutter uses to earn commissions.
The lawsuit also addresses potential damage to The Times’s brand through A.I. “hallucinations,” where chatbots insert incorrect information falsely attributed to the source. Several instances are cited where Microsoft’s Bing Chat provided inaccurate information claimed to be from The Times.
“If The Times and other news organizations cannot produce and protect their independent journalism, there will be a vacuum that no computer or artificial intelligence can fill,” the complaint states, emphasizing the societal cost of less journalism.
The Times has engaged Susman Godfrey as its lead outside counsel for the litigation. Susman previously represented Dominion Voting Systems in its defamation case against Fox News and filed a proposed class action suit against Microsoft and OpenAI on behalf of nonfiction authors.
So, there you have it – The New York Times is standing up against the A.I. giants, defending its rights and work in a legal showdown that could have far-reaching consequences. 📰💻👀
